Active Directory Domains
A comprehensive guide to Active Directory Domains, exploring their architecture, purpose, and common cybersecurity attack surfaces for both defenders and penetration testers.
Feb 17, 2026Windows
For Decates, Active Directiry (AD) has been the backbone of enterprise identity management. It authenticate users, authorizes resources, and enables centralized policy enforcement. However, the Zero Trust security model is reshaping the way enterprises think about identity and access.
This raises an important question:
Can Active Directory and Zero Trust truly coexist, or are they fundamentally at odds?
Active Directory, developed by Microsoft, is a directory service that stores information about objects on a network and makes this information easy for administrators and users to find and use. These objects can include users, computers, printers, file shares, services, and security policies. Traditionally, AD relies on a castle-and-moat model: once inside the network, trust is often implicit.
Zero Trust, coined by Forrester and popularized by NIST SP 800-207, is based on the principle: Never Trust, always verify. Every request - whether from inside or outside the network - must be continuosly authenticated, authorized and encrypted. For a broader perspective see Zero Trust Architecture: The Imperative for Cybersecurity in 2025.
Implicit trust vs. continuous verification AD assumes domain-joined devices and authenticated sessions are "trusted". Zero Trust demands verification for every request.
Perimeter-based vs. identity-centric security AD was designed for on-premises environments. Zero Trust thrives in hybrid or cloud-native setups.
Legacy protocols vs. modern security standards AD relies heavily on Kerberos/NTLM, while Zero Trust pushes for stronger identy providers, conditional access, and multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Despite differences, AD can be a foundation for Zero Trust when extended with the right practices:
Leverage AD for identity, not trust boundaries Treat AD as a source of truth for users and devices.
Integrate with Azure AD or modern IdPs Extend AD into a hybrid identity model with support for conditional access and risk-based authentication.
Implement strong authentication in AD Use MFA, paswordless authentication, and smart cards.
# Example: Require MFA for all users in a specific group.
$group = Get-ADGroup-Member -Identity "ZeroTrust-MFA-Group"
foreach ($user in $group) {
Set-MsolUser -UserPrincipalName $user.UserPrincipalName -StrongAuthenticationRequirements @(
@{RelyingParty="*";State="Enabled";}
)
}# List all accounts with Domain Admin privileges
Get-ADGroupMember -Identity "Domain Admins" | Get-ADUser -Property DisplayName, LastLogonDate# Find accounts with unconstrained delegation (risky in Zero Trust)
Get-ADUser -Filter {TrustedForDelegation -eq $true} -Properties TrustedForDelegationThe Least Privilege Approach significantly reduces the attack surface by preventing lateral movent withing the system.
While some argue that Active Directory's design conflicts with Zero Trust, the reality is more nuanced. AD isn't going away soon - but it's role is changing.
So, can Zero Trust and Active Directory coexist? Yes - but with limitations.
By hardening AD, integrating it with modern identity providers, and enforcing Zero Trust principles like MFA, continuous monitoring, and least privilege, enterprises can bridge the gap between legacy identity systems and modern security models.
Love it? Share this article: