Zero Trust and Active Directory: Can They Coexist?
For Decates, Active Directiry (AD) has been the backbone of enterprise identity management. It authenticate users, authorizes resources, and enables centralized policy enforcement. However, the Zero Trust security model is reshaping the way enterprises think about identity and access.
This raises an important question:
Can Active Directory and Zero Trust truly coexist, or are they fundamentally at odds?
Understanding the Models
What is Active Directory?
Active Directory, developed by Microsoft, is a directory service that stores information about objects on a network and makes this information easy for administrators and users to find and use. These objects can include users, computers, printers, file shares, services, and security policies. Traditionally, AD relies on a castle-and-moat model: once inside the network, trust is often implicit.
What is Zero Trust?
Zero Trust, coined by Forrester and popularized by NIST SP 800-207, is based on the principle: Never Trust, always verify. Every request - whether from inside or outside the network - must be continuosly authenticated, authorized and encrypted. For a broader perspective see Zero Trust Architecture: The Imperative for Cybersecurity in 2025.
Where They Clash
-
Implicit trust vs. continuous verification AD assumes domain-joined devices and authenticated sessions are "trusted". Zero Trust demands verification for every request.
-
Perimeter-based vs. identity-centric security AD was designed for on-premises environments. Zero Trust thrives in hybrid or cloud-native setups.
-
Legacy protocols vs. modern security standards AD relies heavily on Kerberos/NTLM, while Zero Trust pushes for stronger identy providers, conditional access, and multi-factor authentication (MFA).
Where They Complement Each Other
Despite differences, AD can be a foundation for Zero Trust when extended with the right practices:
-
Leverage AD for identity, not trust boundaries Treat AD as a source of truth for users and devices.
-
Integrate with Azure AD or modern IdPs Extend AD into a hybrid identity model with support for conditional access and risk-based authentication.
-
Implement strong authentication in AD Use MFA, paswordless authentication, and smart cards.
Practical Steps to Enable Zero Trust in Active Directory
Enforce Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
# Example: Require MFA for all users in a specific group.
$group = Get-ADGroup-Member -Identity "ZeroTrust-MFA-Group"
foreach ($user in $group) {
Set-MsolUser -UserPrincipalName $user.UserPrincipalName -StrongAuthenticationRequirements @(
@{RelyingParty="*";State="Enabled";}
)
}
Audit Privileged Accounts
# List all accounts with Domain Admin privileges
Get-ADGroupMember -Identity "Domain Admins" | Get-ADUser -Property DisplayName, LastLogonDate
Enable Conditional Access via Azure AD
- Require device compliance (Intune managed).
- Block legacy authentication (disable NTLM & basic auth).
- Enforce session controls for sensitive applications.
Apply the Principle of Least Privilege
# Find accounts with unconstrained delegation (risky in Zero Trust)
Get-ADUser -Filter {TrustedForDelegation -eq $true} -Properties TrustedForDelegation
The Least Privilege Approach significantly reduces the attack surface by preventing lateral movent withing the system.
Challenges in AD + Zero Trust adoption
- Legacy applications that don't support modern authentication.
- Operational overhead of hybrid AD and Azure Ad environments.
- Cultural Shift: moving admins and users away from implicit trust.
Future of Active Directory in Zero Trust World
While some argue that Active Directory's design conflicts with Zero Trust, the reality is more nuanced. AD isn't going away soon - but it's role is changing.
- On-prem AD will likely become just a source of identity
- Cloud-based identity platforms (Azure AD, Okta, etc...) will handle Zero Trust enforcement.
- Security leaders should invest in modernizing AD rather than replacing it overnight.
Conclusion
So, can Zero Trust and Active Directory coexist? Yes - but with limitations.
By hardening AD, integrating it with modern identity providers, and enforcing Zero Trust principles like MFA, continuous monitoring, and least privilege, enterprises can bridge the gap between legacy identity systems and modern security models.
***
Note on Content Creation: This article was developed with the assistance of generative AI like Gemini or ChatGPT. While all public AI strives for accuracy and comprehensive coverage, all content is reviewed and edited by human experts at IsoSecu to ensure factual correctness, relevance, and adherence to our editorial standards.